4.6 Article

The Effects of COMT (Val108/158Met) and DRD4 (SNP-521) Dopamine Genotypes on Brain Activations Related to Valence and Magnitude of Rewards

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 1985-1996

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp263

Keywords

dopamine; fMRI; polymorphism; reward; ventral striatum

Categories

Funding

  1. Volkswagen-Foundation
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  3. [SFB779/A5]
  4. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

People's sensitivity to reinforcing stimuli such as monetary gains and losses shows a wide interindividual variation that might in part be determined by genetic differences. Because of the established role of the dopaminergic system in the neural encoding of rewards and negative events, we investigated young healthy volunteers being homozygous for either the Valine or Methionine variant of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) codon 158 polymorphism as well as homozygous for the C or T variant of the SNP 521 polymorphism of the dopamine 04 receptor. Participants took part in a gambling paradigm featuring unexpectedly high monetary gains and losses in addition to standard gains/losses of expected magnitude while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Valence-related brain activations were seen in the ventral striatum, the anterior cingulate cortex, and the inferior parietal cortex. These activations were modulated by the COMT polymorphism with greater effects for valine/valine participants but not by the 04 receptor polymorphism. By contrast, magnitude-related effects in the anterior insula and the cingulate cortex were modulated by the D4 receptor polymorphism with larger responses for the CC variant. These findings emphasize the differential contribution of genetic variants in the dopaminergic system to various aspects of reward processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available