4.6 Article

The Number of Attentional Foci and Their Precision Are Dissociated in the Posterior Parietal Cortex

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1341-1349

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp197

Keywords

attentive tracking; fMRI; posterior parietal cortex; visual attention

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [MH 071788, F32 EY016982]
  2. Army Research Office [46926-LS]
  3. Office of Naval Research [N000140810407]
  4. National Center for Research Resources
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [F32EY016982] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH071788] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many everyday tasks require us to track moving objects with attention. The demand for attention increases both when more targets are tracked and when the targets move faster. These 2 aspects of attention-assigning multiple attentional foci (or indices) to targets and monitoring each focus with precision-may tap into different cognitive and brain mechanisms. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to quantify the response profile of dorsal attentional areas to variations in the number of attentional foci and their spatiotemporal precision. Subjects were asked to track a specific spoke of either 1 or 2 pinwheels that rotated at various speeds. Their tracking performance declined both when more pinwheels were tracked and when the tracked pinwheels rotated faster. However, posterior parietal activity increased only when subjects tracked more pinwheels but remained flat when they tracked faster moving pinwheels. The frontal eye fields and early visual areas increased activity when there were more targets and when the targets rotated faster. These results suggest that the posterior parietal cortex is specifically involved in indexing independently moving targets with attention but not in monitoring each focus with precision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available