4.6 Article

Thalamic Input to Distal Apical Dendrites in Neocortical Layer 1 Is Massive and Highly Convergent

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 2380-2395

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn259

Keywords

cerebral cortex; cortical microcircuit; dendrites; pyramidal neuron; thalamus; top-down interactions

Categories

Funding

  1. Spain's Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [BFU 2002-04674, BFU 2005-07857, FPU-AP2002-0532]
  2. Carabobo University, Venezuela [CU448]
  3. Autonoma de Madrid University [FPU200613]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Input to apical dendritic tufts is now deemed crucial for associative learning, attention, and similar feedback interactions in the cerebral cortex. Excitatory input to apical tufts in neocortical layer 1 has been traditionally assumed to be predominantly cortical, as thalamic pathways directed to this layer were regarded relatively scant and diffuse. However, the sensitive tracing methods used in the present study show that, throughout the rat neocortex, large numbers (mean similar to 4500/mm(2)) of thalamocortical neurons converge in layer 1 and that this convergence gives rise to a very high local density of thalamic terminals. Moreover, we show that the layer 1-projecting neurons are present in large numbers in most, but not all, motor, association, limbic, and sensory nuclei of the rodent thalamus. Some layer 1-projecting axons branch to innervate large swaths of the cerebral hemisphere, whereas others arborize within only a single cortical area. Present data imply that realistic modeling of cortical circuitry should factor in a dense axonal canopy carrying highly convergent thalamocortical input to pyramidal cell apical tufts. In addition, they are consistent with the notion that layer 1-projecting axons may be a robust anatomical substrate for extensive feedback interactions between cortical areas via the thalamus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available