4.6 Article

Transforming Growth Factor β Promotes Neuronal Cell Fate of Mouse Cortical and Hippocampal Progenitors In Vitro and In Vivo: Identification of Nedd9 as an Essential Signaling Component

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 661-671

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp134

Keywords

cerebral cortex; differentiation; Hef1; Nestin; progenitor

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaf [SFB 780]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transforming Growth Factor beta (Tgf beta) and associated signaling effectors are expressed in the forebrain, but little is known about the role of this multifunctional cytokine during forebrain development. Using hippocampal and cortical primary cell cultures of developing mouse brains, this study identified Tgf beta-regulated genes not only associated with cell cycle exit of progenitors but also with adoption of neuronal cell fate. Accordingly, we observed not only an antimitotic effect of Tgf beta on progenitors but also an increased expression of neuronal markers in Tgf beta treated cultures. This effect was dependent upon Smad4. Furthermore, in vivo loss-of-function analyses using Tgf beta 2(-/-)/Tgf beta 3(-/-) double mutant mice showed the opposite effect of increased cell proliferation and fewer neurons in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Gata2, Runx1, and Nedd9 were candidate genes regulated by Tgf beta and known to be involved in developmental processes of neuronal progenitors. Using siRNA-mediated knockdown, we identified Nedd9 as an essential signaling component for the Tgf beta-dependent increase in neuronal cell fate. Expression of this scaffolding protein, which is mainly described as a signaling molecule of the beta 1-integrin pathway, was not only induced after Tgf beta treatment but was also associated with morphological changes of the Nestin-positive progenitor pool observed upon exposure to Tgf beta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available