4.2 Article

Concordance in judgments among c-erbB-2 (HER2/neu) overexpression detected by two immunohistochemical tests and gene amplification detected by Southern blot hybridization in breast carcinoma

Journal

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 26-32

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE ASIA
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2001.01163.x

Keywords

breast cancer; c-erbB-2 (HER2/neu); gene amplification; HercepTest(TM); immunohistochemistry; interobserver agreement

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared the c-erbB-2 protein overexpression status detected by the HercepTest(TM) (DAKO A/S, Grostrup, Denmark) with another conventional immunohistochemistry system using an anti-c-erbB-2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Nichirei Co., Tokyo, Japan) and with the c-erbB-2 gene amplification status detected by Southern blot hybridization in 101 surgically resected breast carcinomas. According to the criteria for overexpression, recommended by the manufacturer, c-erbB-2 overexpression by HercepTest(TM) was detected in 24 cancers (24%), comprising six score-2 tumors and 18 score-3 tumors. The level of agreement in judgment of the HercepTest(TM), among three independent observers, was excellent (kappa = 0.845). C-erbB-2 overexpression by Nichirei's antibody and c-erbB-2 gene amplification were detected in 21% and 16% of cases, respectively, and their concordance with HercepTest(TM) scores of 2-3 was 89% and 90%, respectively. In the score-3 cases by Hercep Test(TM) only, the concordance rates with overexpression by Nichirei's immunohistochemistry and with gene amplification were slightly higher, 94% and 93%, respectively. Score-2 cases by HercepTest(TM) were mostly judged as negative overexpression by Nichirei's antibody and as no amplification by Southern blot hybridization. The present results showed that HercepTest(TM) score-3 detected c-erbB-2 overexpression almost optimally as well as the conventional methods and the score-3 breast carcinomas had clinical and biological implications. Further examination would be necessary to decide the significance of breast cancers of HercepTest(TM) score 2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available