4.6 Article

Late Origin of Glia-Restricted Progenitors in the Developing Mouse Cerebral Cortex

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages I135-I143

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp046

Keywords

clonal analysis; cortical development; gliogenesis; neurogenesis; video microscopy

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Bavarian State Ministry of Sciences, Research and the Arts
  3. European Trascriptome, Regulome and Cellular Commitment Consortium (EUTRACC)
  4. Helmholtz Alliance for Mental Health in,in Ageing Society (HELMA)
  5. Alexander-von-Humboldt postdoctoral fellowship
  6. Munich Center for Integrated Protein Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to unravel the molecular determinants of cell fate, it is important to understand when fate restriction occurs during brain development. Lineage analysis suggested that bi- or multipotent progenitors persist into late developmental stages in some central nervous system regions, whereas most progenitor cells in the cerebral cortex appeared to be restrained to generate only a single cell type already at early stages. Here we discuss this previous work and present new data demonstrating that cortical progenitors generating exclusively glial cells appear late in development. In utero transduction of cortical progenitors at early and mid-neurogenesis using a combination of replication-defective retroviral vectors encoding different fluorescent proteins indicated that the early developing cortex is devoid of glia-restricted progenitors, although these are frequent during mid- and late neurogenesis. Clonal analyses in vitro using retroviral vectors and live cell tracking by video time-lapse microscopy confirmed these findings, revealing that the early developing cortex harbors 2 main progenitor types: neuron-restricted and bipotent (neuron-glial) progenitors. The latter are responsible for the generation of glial-restricted progenitors at mid- and late neurogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available