4.6 Article

Cholinergic Modulation Differs between Basal and Apical Dendritic Excitation of Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 1865-1877

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp251

Keywords

current source density; dendritic excitation; excitatory postsynaptic potential; muscarinic receptors; population spike; presynaptic inhibition

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 15685]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We hypothesize that endogenous cholinergic modulation of dendritic processing of hippocampal CA1 is layer specific, and it specifically enhances spike output resulting from basal as compared with the apical dendritic excitation. Laminar profiles of evoked field potentials were recorded in the CA1 area of urethane-anesthetized rats using multichannel silicon probes and analyzed as current source density. High-frequency stimulation of the pontis oralis (Pn0) attenuated the midapical more than the basal or distal apical dendritic excitatory sink. Population spike (PS) and excitatory sink-PS potentiation resulting from basal dendritic excitation were facilitated, while the PS evoked by apical dendritic stimulation was attenuated by Pn0 stimulation. Perfusion of cholinergic agonist carbachol onto hippocampal slices in vitro also attenuated the apical more than the basal dendritic excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Excitatory sink attenuation and PS changes after Pn0 stimulation were blocked by systemic or local scopolamine and by intracerebroventricular (icy) M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine but not by icy M2 receptor antagonist AFDX-116 or nicotinic antagonists. However, a hippocampal theta rhythm activated by Pn0 stimulation was blocked by systemic but not by local scopolamine. We conclude that endogenous acetylcholine mediates a stronger presynaptic inhibition of the midapical than basal and distal apical excitation mainly through M1 receptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available