4.6 Article

A Dual Role for Prediction Error in Associative Learning

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 1175-1185

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn161

Keywords

associative learning; cross-modal; dynamic causal modeling; effective connectivity; fMRI; Rescorla-Wagner model

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [0856780/Z/99/B]
  2. Wellcome Trust PhD studentship [078047/ZS/04/Z]
  3. University Research Priority Program
  4. University of Zurich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Confronted with a rich sensory environment, the brain must learn statistical regularities across sensory domains to construct causal models of the world. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to furnish neurophysiological evidence that statistical associations are learnt, even when task-irrelevant. Subjects performed an audio-visual target-detection task while being exposed to distractor stimuli. Unknown to them, auditory distractors predicted the presence or absence of subsequent visual distractors. We modeled incidental learning of these associations using a Rescorla-Wagner (RW) model. Activity in primary visual cortex and putamen reflected learning-dependent surprise: these areas responded progressively more to unpredicted, and progressively less to predicted visual stimuli. Critically, this prediction-error response was observed even when the absence of a visual stimulus was surprising. We investigated the underlying mechanism by embedding the RW model into a DCM to show that auditory to visual connectivity changed significantly over time as a function of prediction error. Thus, consistent with predictive coding models of perception, associative learning is mediated by prediction-error dependent changes in connectivity. These results posit a dual role for prediction-error in encoding surprise and driving associative plasticity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available