4.6 Article

Neuronal Correlates of Local, Lateral, and Translaminar Inhibition with Reference to Cortical Columns

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 926-937

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn141

Keywords

axon; barrel cortex; cluster analysis; cortical column; GABAergic interneuron; lateral inhibition; layer 2; 3

Categories

Funding

  1. Max-Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the neocortex, inhibition by gamma-aminobutyric acidergic (GABAergic) interneurons is essential for shaping cortical maps, which represent sensory signals. For a detailed understanding of the stream of excitation evoked, for example, by a sensory stimulus, interneurons must be identified with reference to their impact on excitatory neurons located in different laminae of the same (home) and surround columns. We analyzed the axonal projection of layer 2/3 (L2/3) interneurons with reference to geometric landmarks of cortical columns by staining neurons in acute slices of rat barrel cortex (P20-P29) and a subsequent cluster analysis using morphological parameters that described the spatial distribution of axons. The cluster analysis defined 4 main axonal projection types referred to as 1) local inhibitors (including chandelier neurons), 2) lateral inhibitors, 3) translaminar L2/3-to-L4/5 inhibitors, and 4) translaminar L2/3-to-L1 inhibitors. The putative innervation domains established by axonal projections of the 4 types of interneurons and the dendritic domains of their target excitatory neurons were 1) L2/3 of the home column, 2) L2/3 of both the home and neighboring columns, 3) L4 and L5A of the home column, and 4) L1 and L2/3 of the home column. The quantitative analysis of the axonal projection patterns of an unselected sample of 51 interneurons located in L2/3 thus defined anatomical correlates for local, lateral, and translaminar inhibition within and between cortical columns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available