4.6 Article

Increased Impulsivity during Withdrawal from Cocaine Self-Administration: Role for ΔFosB in the Orbitofrontal Cortex

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 435-444

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn094

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Drug Addiction [R01 DA 07359, P01 DA 08227]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased impulsivity caused by addictive drugs is believed to contribute to the maintenance of addiction and has been linked to hypofunction within the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Recent data indicate that cocaine self-administration induces the transcription factor Delta FosB in the OFC that alters the effects of investigator-administered cocaine on impulsivity. Here, using viral-mediated gene transfer, the effects of overexpressing Delta FosB within the OFC were assessed on the cognitive sequelae of chronic cocaine self-administration as measured by the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRT). Cognitive testing occurred in the mornings, and self-administration sessions in the evenings, to enable the progressive assessment of repeated volitional drug intake on performance. Animals self-administering cocaine initially made more omissions and premature or impulsive responses on the 5CSRT but quickly developed tolerance to these disruptive effects. However, withdrawal from cocaine dramatically increased premature responding. When access to cocaine was increased, animals overexpressing Delta FosB failed to regulate their intake as effectively and were more impulsive during withdrawal. In summary, rats develop tolerance to the cognitive disruption caused by cocaine self-administration and show a deficit in impulse control that is unmasked during withdrawal. Our findings suggest that induction of Delta FosB within the OFC is one mediator of these effects and, thereby, increases vulnerability to addiction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available