4.6 Article

Effect of varying solids concentration and organic loading on the performance of temperature phased anaerobic digestion process

Journal

WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 142-148

Publisher

WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION
DOI: 10.2175/106143002X139857

Keywords

temperature-phased anaerobic digestion; thermophilic digestion; thickened sludge; ammonia inhibition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of varying total solids (TS) and volatile solids (VS) concentrations and organic loading on the performance of a temperature phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) system treating a mixture of primary and waste activated sludges was evaluated, An optimum volatile solids destruction of 61.5% occurred at a feed concentration of 4.9% (corresponding to 3.8% VS concentration) in the system operated at a total detention time of 20 days. At a total solids concentration of 7.9% (5.8% VS concentration), the volatile solids destruction efficiency dropped to 52.5%. At all conditions (4.4 to 7.9% TS) the TPAD system was able to meet the requirements for Class A biosolids, including those for fecal coliform and volatile solids destruction. The effluent fecal coliform concentration never exceeded 628 most probable number (MPN)/g TS. Thermophilic biomass activity tests were run on both the thermophilic (55 degreesC) and the mesophilic (35 degreesC) sludge. Biomass from the thermophilic reactor showed much greater activity at 55 degreesC than at 35 degreesC. However, significant activity was still present when the test was run at 35 degreesC. Activity tests completed on samples from the mesophitic reactor also had high activities at 55 degreesC, sometimes equal to the activity of the thermophilic biomass. These results suggest that the bacterial consortia in the TPAD system may be temperature-tolerant and not necessarily two distinct communities with two distinct temperature regimes as had been previously assumed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available