4.1 Article

Validation of Molecular Markers for Pre-harvest Sprouting Resistance in Bread Wheat

Journal

CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 194-203

Publisher

AKADEMIAI KIADO RT
DOI: 10.1556/CRC.40.2012.2.3

Keywords

pre-harvest sprouting; molecular marker; marker validation; marker assisted selection; wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Categories

Funding

  1. Canada Research Chairs Program
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. Saskatchewan Innovation Fund
  4. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the major abiotic constraints influencing production of high quality grain. Selection for pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in early generations is difficult because it is expressed as a quantitatively inherited trait and subject to environmental effects. The objectives of this study were to validate a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) for PHS resistance on chromosome 4A in bread wheat and to isolate near-isogenic lines for this QTL using marker-assisted selection. A total of 60 Canadian wheat cultivars and experimental lines were screened with three SSR markers in a QTL region for PHS resistance. The SSR markers DuPw004, barc170 and wmc650 explained 67%, 75% and 60% of total variation in germination (%), respectively, among different wheat genotypes. Marker assisted back crossing with DuPw004 reduced the population size in BC1F1 and BC2F1 generation by 41% and 59%, respectively. A survey of pedigrees of different genotypes revealed that the parental line RL4137 is a major source of increased PHS resistance in a number of western Canadian wheat cultivars. Microsatellite markers (DuPw004, barc170 and wmc650) will be useful for plant breeders to pyramid QTL from different PHS resistance sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available