4.4 Article

Honeybee-assisted wind pollination in bamboo Phyllostachys nidularia (Bambusoideae : Poaceae)?

Journal

BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages 1-7

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00001.x

Keywords

floral syndrome; mast flowering; Phyllostachys heteroclada; P. nuda; pollen/ovule ratio; pollination efficiency

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Floral syndromes and pollination of three species of Phyllostachys bamboos were studied in Central China in 1999 and 2000. All were protogynous. Stigmas were receptive and had pollen deposited on them 2 days before anther dehiscence. The period of anthesis in the three bamboos was 3 days. Individual pollen grains of the three species were similar in size (30-40 mum in diameter) and had features typical of wind-pollinated plants. The ratios of pollen to ovules (p/o ratio) in P. nidularia, P. heteroclada and P. nuda were 6500, 12 700 and 33 000, respectively. Mean pollen loads on each flower (one ovule) of these three species were 7.3, 8.8 and 9.4 grains, respectively. Pollen transfer in P. heteroclada and P. nuda depended on wind, and no flower visitors were seen in the field. However, in P. nidularia, Apis cerana Fab. was a frequent pollen collector observed from 1200 to 1330 h. The visits undertaken by thousands of honeybees resulted in a large number of pollen grains being released from the anthers in a short time (10-15 min) in one day, which accelerated and synchronized the release of pollen from the anthers that seemed to enhance the chance of pollination. Given that honeybees played an indirect role in pollen transfer this could partly explain the low p/o ratio in P. nidularia. Reviewing the literature, we found insect visits to flowers of bamboos were not infrequent phenomena. We suggest pollination efficiency should be considered as one selective factor in attempts to understand mast flowering in bamboo. (C) 2002 The Linnean Society of London.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available