4.7 Article

Inert substrate-supported microtubular solid oxide fuel cells based on highly porous ceramic by low-temperature co-sintering

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 579-587

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.211

Keywords

Microtubular; Solid oxide fuel cell; Zirconia support; Co-sintering; Dip-coating

Funding

  1. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) [NNX15CC12C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inert substrate-supported microtubular solid oxide fuel cells (MT-SOFCs) are attractive due to their advantages, including high reduction-oxidation (redox) cycling stability and thermal cycling tolerance. A method involving sequential dip-coating, leaching, and co-sintering was developed and applied to fabricate inert substrate-supported MT-SOFCs through acid leaching nickel from the conventional Ni-yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) anode. A thin current collector was deposited onto the support surface to minimize the current collection losses by collecting current from the entire surface area of the anode. A dense electrolyte could be obtained at a co sintering temperature of 1250 degrees C. The produced MT-SOFC with the configuration of porous zirconia support/Ni-Scandia-stabilized zirconia (SSZ) anode current collector/Ni-SSZ anode/SSZ electrolyte/strontium-doped lanthanum manganite (LSM)-SSZ cathode/LSM cathode current collector was evaluated by electrochemical characterization tests. The inert substrate-supported MT-SOFC exhibited the maximum power densities of 616, 542, 440, and 300 mW cm(-2) at 800, 750, 700, and 650 degrees C, respectively using dry hydrogen and air. In addition, the thermal cycling stability of the MT-SOFC was evaluated. The cell survived from thermal cycling tests and came out intact after 50 thermal cycles between 700 degrees C and 400 degrees C during an operation time of 50 h.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available