4.5 Article

Joint symbolic dynamic analysis of beat-to-beat interactions of heart rate and systolic blood pressure in normal pregnancy

Journal

MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 241-245

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/BF02348131

Keywords

heart rate variability; blood pressure variability; pregnancy; portapres; symbolic dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pregnancy induces important changes in the autonomic control. Measures of heart rate (HR) variability and systolic blood pressure (SP) variability are sensitive to those changes. The interactions between HR and SP are complex and strongly non-linear. Therefore they cannot be completely described by linear analysis techniques. A study of joint symbolic dynamics is presented as a new short-term non-linear analysis method to investigate the interactions between HR and SP. Continuous, non-invasive 30 min blood pressure recordings (Portapres) of 25 pregnant and 14 non-pregnant women were analysed. Time series of beat-to-beat HR and SP were extracted. Using the concept of joint symbolic dynamics, HR and SP changes were transformed into a bivariate symbol vector. Subsequently, this symbol vector was transformed into a word series (words consisting of three successive symbols), and the probability of occurrence of each word type was calculated and compared between both groups. Significant differences were found in five word types between pregnant and non-pregnant women: w(0,4)(0.021 +/- 0.011 against 0.008 +/- 0.006; p = 0.022), w(4,6)(0.020 +/- 0.010 against 0.007 +/- 0.003, p = 0.001), w(3,2)(0.004 +/- 0.003 against 0.007 +/- 0.003, p = 0.038), w(6,5)(0.009 +/- 0.007 against 0.023 +/- 0.008; p<0.001) and w(3,6)(0-011 +/- 0.007 against 0.023 0.008; p = 0.001). Joint symbolic dynamics provides an efficient non-linear representation of HR and SP interactions that offers simple physiological interpretations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available