4.6 Article

Mechanical properties of visible light-cured resins reinforced with hydroxyapatite for dental restoration

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 49-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00019-7

Keywords

dental composite; mechanical properties; hydroxyapatite; Bis-GMA; TEGDMA; HEMA; coupling agent

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to measure and analyze the mechanical properties of several composite materials designed for dental restoration. Methods: The materials were composed of a visible light-curing monomer mixture (either Bis-GMA + TEGDMA or Bis-GMA + HEMA) as a matrix and hydroxyapatite (either microscopic or nanoscopic particles) as a reinforcing filler. The surface of the hydroxyapatite particles was modified by using a coupling agent (citric, malic, acrylic or methacrylic acid). Five specimens of 14 different composites were prepared for each mechanical test: flexural strength, Young's modulus and Vickers hardness. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated, and ANOVA and Student Newman Keuls multiple comparison tests were applied (P < 0.05). Results: The addition of 50-60 wt% of hydroxyapatite particles to the unfilled monomer mixtures led to the increase of both Young's modulus and surface hardness of the material, while the flexural strength decreased. In general, when microscopic instead of nanoscopic hydroxyapatite was used as a reinforcing filler, mechanical properties were favored. The mechanical properties were also improved by adding citric, acrylic or methacrylic acid as a coupling agent. Conclusions: An adequate surface modification of the hydroxyapatite particles conferred enhanced mechanical properties to the final dental composite. Microscopic-hydroxyapatite particles are preferred to nanoscopic ones. (C) 2002 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available