4.4 Article

Soil properties under a Pinus radiata-ryegrass silvopastoral system in New Zealand. Part I. Soil N and moisture availability, soil C, and tree growth

Journal

AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 137-147

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1015040006181

Keywords

ammonium; competition; mineral N; nitrate; pasture; radiata pine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the changes in soil properties in silvopastoral systems is important in regulating the interactions between tree and understorey pastures. In this study, the effects of understorey management on soil mineral N and moisture availability, soil temperature, soil C, and tree growth were investigated in a seven-year-old silvopastoral agroforestry experiment in Canterbury, New Zealand. The systems included understorey treatments of bare ground and ryegrass (Lolium perenne) pasture. Soil mineral N, moisture content, and temperature were monitored from July 1997 to July 1998 in two positions (0.9 and 3.5 m north of tree rows) and two soil depths (0-10 and 10-20 cm). Soil C and N in the 0-10 cm depth were higher in the ryegrass than in the bare ground plots, reflecting the organic C and N input in the ryegrass plots, as well as greater N loss from the bare ground plots in the form of nitrate leaching and/or denitrification. Soil C was higher in the position 0.9 m than 3.5 m away from the tree rows, possibly caused by the greater C input from decomposing fine tree roots and needle litterfall at the 0.9 m position. Soil moisture availability was greater in the bare ground than in the ryegrass plots in the summer. No effect of understorey management on soil temperature was found. Soil nitrate levels were lower in the ryegrass plots and may be limiting when soil moisture supply was adequate. Tree volume growth from winter 1997 to 1998 was significantly greater in the bare ground treatment, reflecting better soil moisture and N supply conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available