4.5 Article

Elastomeric biodegradable polyurethane blends for soft tissue applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER EDITION
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 391-406

Publisher

VSP BV
DOI: 10.1163/156856202320253929

Keywords

polyurethane; elastomer; biodegradable; scaffold; tissue engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four biodegradable polyurethane blends were made from segmented polyurethanes that contain amino acid-based chain extender and diisocyanate, groups. The soft segments of these parent polyurethanes were either polyethylene oxide (PEO) or polycaprolactone (PCL) diols. The blends were developed to investigate the effect of varying soft segment compositions on the overall morphological, mechanical, and degradative properties of the materials, with a view to producing a family of materials with a wide range of properties. The highly hydrophilic PEO material was incorporated to increase the blend's susceptibility to degradation, while the PCL polyurethane was selected to provide higher moduli and percent elongations (strains) than the PEO parent materials can achieve. All four blends were determined to be semi-crystalline, elastomeric materials that possess similarly shaped stress-strain curves to that of the PCL-based parent polyurethane. As the percent composition of PEO polyurethane within the blend increased, the material became weaker and less extensible. The blends demonstrated rapid initial degradation in buffer followed by significantly slower, prolonged degradation, likely corresponding to an initial loss of primarily PEO-containing polymer, followed by the slower degradation of the PCL polyurethane. All four blends were successfully formed into three-dimensional porous scaffolds utilizing solvent casting/particulate leaching methods. Since these new blends possess a range of mechanical and degradation properties and can be shaped into three-dimensional objects, these materials may hold potential for use in soft tissue engineering scaffold applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available