4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Genetic regulation of ionizing radiation sensitivity and breast cancer risk

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS
Volume 39, Issue 2-3, Pages 208-215

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/em.10058

Keywords

ionizing radiation; cell-cycle delay; genetic susceptibility; breast cancer risk

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA073629, R03CA091221, R29CA073629, P30CA012197] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [CA-91221, CA-73629, CA-12197] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic variability in DNA repair may contribute to hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR) and susceptibility to breast cancer. We used samples collected from a clinic-based breast cancer case-control study to test the working hypothesis that amino acid substitution variants of DNA repair genes may contribute to prolonged cell-cycle delay following IR and breast cancer risk. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis was used to measure cell-cycle delay. PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assays were used to determine four genotypes of three DNA repair genes: XRCC1, 194 Arg/Trp and 399 Arg/Gln; XRCC3, 241 Thr/Met; and APE1, 148 Asp/Glu. The data showed that breast cancer patients had a significantly higher delay index than that of controls (P < 0.001); the means +/- SD for cases and controls were 36.0 +/- 13.1 (n = 118) and 31.4 +/- 11.5 (n = 225), respectively. There was a significant dose-response relationship between delay index, categorized into quartiles, and an increasing risk of breast cancer (crude odds ratios: 1.00, 1.00, 1.27, and 2.46, respectively; P-trend = 0.002). In controls, prolonged cell-cycle delay was significantly associated with the number of variant alleles in APE I Asp148Glu and XRCC1 Arg399Gln genotypes (P-trend = 0.001). Although larger studies are needed to validate the results, our data suggest that an inherited hypersensitivity to IR may contribute to human breast carcinogenesis. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available