Journal
CELLS TISSUES ORGANS
Volume 172, Issue 3, Pages 218-236Publisher
KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000066965
Keywords
differentiation; cell-cell adhesion; invasion; trophoblast; choriocarcinoma; placenta; embryo implantation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The establishment of pregnancy in the human decisively depends on the competence of the early trophoblast to interact during implantation with (1) the uterine epithelium and subsequently (2) with the endometrial stroma and blood vessels. In the interaction with uterine epithelium cell-to-cell adhesion appears to be a critical element, involving initially (and astonishingly) apical cell poles of both epithelia. The subsequent invasion of the stroma includes both adhesive interactions with and degradation of extracellular matrix. How these different processes are regulated in detail remains largely unknown. While the invasiveness of the trophoblast is known to be regulated in local and temporal terms it has remained unclear so far whether trophoblast adhesiveness to cells and/or matrix is subject to a coupled regulation or whether both properties involve different, maybe sequentially effective, control mechanisms. It is also not known how the regulation of these activities is related to the differentiation pathways leading to the formation of noninvasive villous trophoblast serving endocrine as well as nutritive functions, This communication reviews experiments using normal cytotrophoblast cells isolated from first trimester or term placentae as well as malignant trophoblast (choriocarcinoma) cells treated with a panel of compounds known to modulate cell differentiation [retinoic acid, methotrexate, dibutyryl-cAMP, phorbol-(12-myristoyl-13-acetyl)-diester]. Parameters indicative of trophoblast differentiation [in particular chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) secretion] as well as adhesion to uterine epithelial cells and invasion into extracellular matrix in vitro were monitored. While expression of differentiation parameters was increased by all drug treatments, adhesion to uterine epithelial cells in vitro was reduced. Modulation of invasiveness, however, followed a different pattern: while it was reduced in normal trophoblast cells it was even increased in choriocarcinoma cells with various substances. The response of cells with respect to production of extracellular matrix proteins or matrix-degrading proteinases showed a complex pattern that again lacked a stringent correlation with hCG production and adhesion, and in addition also with invasive behavior. These results suggest that adhesiveness of trophoblast to uterine epithelial cells and invasiveness into the uterine stroma (extracellular matrix) are subject to different control mechanisms. They support the view that trophoblast-endometrium interactions involve a cascade of various adhesion and migration processes whose cellular and molecular basis is complex but accessible to experimental investigation using a variety of available in vitro systems. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available