3.8 Article

Cortical area and species differences in dendritic spine morphology

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCYTOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 3-5, Pages 337-346

Publisher

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024134312173

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY013237] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS040726] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NEI NIH HHS [EY13237] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [NS40726] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dendritic spines receive most excitatory inputs in the neocortex and are morphologically very diverse. Recent evidence has demonstrated linear relationships between the size and length of dendritic spines and important features of its synaptic junction and time constants for calcium compartmentalisation. Therefore, the morphologies of dendritic spines can be directly interpreted functionally. We sought to explore whether there were potential differences in spine morphologies between areas and species that could reflect potential functional differences. For this purpose, we reconstructed and measured thousands of dendritic spines from basal dendrites of layer III pyramidal neurons from mouse temporal and occipital cortex and from human temporal cortex. We find systematic differences in spine densities, spine head size and spine neck length among areas and species. Human spines are systematically larger and longer and exist at higher densities than those in mouse cortex. Also, mouse temporal spines are larger than mouse occipital spines. We do not encounter any correlations between the size of the spine head and its neck length. Our data suggests that the average synaptic input is modulated according to cortical area and differs among species. We discuss the implications of these findings for common algorithms of cortical processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available