4.7 Review

Associative deficit accounts of disrupted latent inhibition and blocking in schizophrenia

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 203-216

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00067-7

Keywords

schizophrenia; acute schizophrenia; latent inhibition; blocking; latent inhibition model; associative learning; associative deficit; attention deficit

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [33881] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Latent inhibition (attenuated responding to a signal due to signal-alone presentations preceding the signal-outcome pairings) and blocking (attenuated responding to Signal B due to Signal A being paired with the outcome prior to pairings of an AB compound with the outcome) are reportedly absent in acute schizophrenics. The common assumption that these phenomena reflect the normal functioning of attention and the observation that rats administered low doses of amphetamine show a similar disruption has resulted in the development of an animal model of attentional dysfunction in acute schizophrenia. Here, we selectively review the experimental and clinical literature concerning latent inhibition and blocking, their disruption in acute schizophrenia, and the current status of this model. We conclude that the construct validity of the model is compromised if latent inhibition and blocking are viewed in attentional terms because experimental data indicate both phenomena can be better understood in associative terms. We favor a framework in which disruption of latent inhibition and blocking in acute schizophrenics is viewed as an inability to compare and express stored representations (i.e. associative performance deficit). This change of perspective does not undermine the potential value of the model, but rather suggests that the nature of its validity should be reconsidered. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available