4.0 Article

Trend tests for case-control studies of genetic markers: Power, sample size and robustness

Journal

HUMAN HEREDITY
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 146-152

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000064976

Keywords

candidate gene associations; Cochran-Armitage trend test; MAX test; maximin efficiency robust test; power approximation; sample size

Funding

  1. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY014478] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NEI NIH HHS [EY14478] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Cochran-Armitage trend test is commonly used as a genotype-based test for candidate gene association. Corresponding to each underlying genetic model there is a particular set of scores assigned to the genotypes that maximizes its power. When the variance of the test statistic is known, the formulas for approximate power and associated sample size are readily obtained. In practice, however, the variance of the test statistic needs to be estimated. We present formulas for the required sample size to achieve a prespecified power that account for the need to estimate the variance of the test statistic. When the underlying genetic model is unknown one can incur a substantial loss of power when a test suitable for one mode of inheritance is used where another mode is the true one. Thus, tests having good power properties relative to the optimal tests for each model are useful. These tests are called efficiency robust and we study two of them: the maximin efficiency robust test is a linear combination of the standardized optimal tests that has high efficiency and the MAX test, the maximum of the standardized optimal tests. Simulation results of the robustness of these two tests indicate that the more computationally involved MAX test is preferable. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available