4.7 Article

Microstructure and optical properties of electrodeposited Al-doped ZnO nanosheets

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 119-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.05.154

Keywords

Defects; X-ray methods; Optical properties; ZnO

Funding

  1. National Taiwan Ocean University [NTOU-RD-AA-2010-104031]
  2. National Science Council of the Republic of China [NSC 99-2221-E-019- 055]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study grew Al-doped ZnO nanosheets on polycrystalline zinc foils using cathodic electrodeposition in an aqueous solution consisting of 0.02 M Zn(NO3)(2) and 0.001 M Al(NO3)(3) at 90 degrees C. The effects of the electrodepositing potential and thermal annealing on the physical properties of the Al-doped ZnO sheets were investigated. This study observed a high quality sheet-like structure of the electrodeposited Al-doped ZnO for the applied potential larger than -1.1 V, and the sheets were interconnected over the area of interest. The X-ray diffraction patterns showed that the intensity of the Bragg reflections of the electrodeposited Al-doped ZnO sheets increases with the electrodepositing potential because a larger applied potential results in the Al-doped ZnO sheets having a larger lateral dimension and thickness. However, the appearance of the Al-doped ZnO sheets becomes coarse and rough after thermal annealing at 400 degrees C in ambient air for 4 h. The intensity of the Bragg reflections of the Al-doped ZnO sheets was markedly increased through the thermal annealing due to the improvement of the crystalline quality of the annealed Al-doped ZnO sheets. Annealing caused a large decrease in structural defects of the Al-doped ZnO sheets electrodeposited at -1.3 V causing the sheets to exhibit a sharp photoluminescence peak at similar to 380 nm. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available