Journal
GERONTOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 22-29Publisher
KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000048920
Keywords
ageing; methodology; cognition
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Critical issues regarding the utility of age-heterogeneous cross-sectional samples for estimating associations among rates of change are briefly reviewed and further examined in response to the four insightful commentaries on our original discussion paper. These general issues are considered in terms of current practice in gerontological studies. Several of the commentaries refer to additional problems (e.g., selection/attrition, cohort differences) with cross-sectional designs for inferring correlated rates of change, often modeled as shared age-related variance. The commentators concurred with, and performed simulations that support, our primary contention that the influence of mean population trends over time has a major confounding influence on cross-sectional estimates of association. While this confound has been acknowledged and demonstrated in a number of publications over this century, cross-sectional studies and covariance modeling remain common practice in gerontological studies. We question the value of this practice for advancing aging theory and would like to see greater emphasis placed on longitudinal studies and the use of cross-sectional designs and analytic methods that permit separation of age-related mean trends from estimates of association between age-related variables. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available