4.3 Article

Integration, individuality and species concepts

Journal

BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 651-660

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022596904397

Keywords

clade; historical entity; individual; integration; lineage; ontology; organism; species

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Integration (interaction among parts of an entity) is suggested to be necessary for individuality (contraGhiselin (1997), Metaphysics and the Origin of Species). A synchronic species is an integrated individual that can evolve as a unified whole; a diachronic lineage is a non-integrated historical entity that cannot evolve. Synchronic species and diachronic lineages are consequently suggested to be ontologically distinct entities, rather than alternative perspectives of the same underlying entity (contra Baum (1998), Syst. Biol. 47, 641-653; de Queiroz (1995), Endless Forms : Species and Speciation, pp. 57-75; Hey (2001) Genes, Categories and Species). Species concepts usually refer to either one or the other entity; for instance, the Biological Species Concept refers to synchronic species, whereas the Cladistic Species Concept refers to diachronic lineages. The debate over species concepts has often failed to recognise this distinction, resulting in invalid comparisons between definitions that attempt to delineate fundamentally different entities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available