4.5 Article

Reliability of measurements of patient health status: a comparison of physician, patient, and caregiver ratings

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 187-192

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1353-8020(01)00009-8

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; measurement reliability

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R29NS032009] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this preliminary study was to investigate the inter-rater reliability among physician, patient, and caregiver ratings on the Hoehn & Yahr (H & Y) and Schwab & England (S & E) rating instruments. We also examined differences in ratings between patients who attended clinic with and without caregivers (spouses and adult children). Patients and caregivers coming for an appointment at Colorado Neurological Institute were asked to independently complete the H & Y and S & E scales. Physicians rated the patients during the exam. In the group of patients who came to clinic with caregivers, there was significant agreement on both the H & Y and S & E (P < 0.001). For patients not accompanied by caregivers, patients rated themselves as more debilitated on the S & E than physicians (P < 0.001). Patients without caregivers rated themselves as more functional than patients with caregivers on both scales (P < 0.001). Physicians also rated patients without caregivers as more functional on both scales (P < 0.001). Results indicated there was consistency among ratings of physicians and patients accompanied by caregivers on both scales. Patients attending clinic alone rated themselves as worse on the S & E than physicians. Patients alone were rated as more functional than patients accompanied by caregivers on both scales regardless of rater. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available