4.3 Article

Receptive field structure of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex revealed by stimulation with natural image sequences

Journal

JOURNAL OF VISION
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 12-24

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/2.1.2

Keywords

reverse correlation; triggered correlation; primate; recursive least squares; linear-nonlinear model; system identification

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EY-12816, EY-08300, EY-01472]
  2. Sloan Foundation
  3. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY001472, R01EY012816, R01EY008300] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Probing the visual system with the ensemble of signals that occur in the natural environment may reveal aspects of processing that are not evident in the neural responses to artificial stimulus sets, such as conventional bars and sinusoidal gratings. However, unsolved is the question of how to use complex natural stimulation, many aspects of which the experimenter cannot completely specify, to study neural processing. Here a method is presented to investigate the structure of a neuron's receptive field based on its response to movie clips and other stimulus ensembles. As a particular case, the technique provides an estimate of the conventional first-order receptive field of a neuron, similar to what can be obtained with other reverse-correlation schemes. This is demonstrated experimentally and with computer simulations. Our analysis also revealed that the receptive fields of both simple and complex cells had regions where image boundaries, independent of their contrast sign, would enhance or suppress the cell's response. In some cases, these signals were tuned for the orientation of the boundary. This demonstrates for the first time that it might be feasible to investigate the receptive field structure of visual neurons from their responses to natural image sequences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available