4.4 Article

BMS-927711 for the acute treatment of migraine: A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, dose-ranging trial

Journal

CEPHALALGIA
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 114-125

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102413500727

Keywords

Calcitonin gene-related peptide; BMS-927711; migraine; double-blind

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background BMS-927711 is a potent, selective, competitive human calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist that has shown invivo efficacy without vasoconstrictor effect. The objective of the current study was to determine an effective and tolerable dose range of BMS-927711 for the acute treatment of migraine. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, dose-ranging study, 885 patients were randomized using an adaptive design to one of the following dose groups: BMS-927711 (10, 25, 75, 150, 300, or 600mg); sumatriptan 100mg (active comparator); and placebo. Patients were treated for a single migraine attack. The primary endpoint was pain freedom at two hours post-dose. Results Of patients who took the study drug, 799 had one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. Significantly more patients in the BMS-927711 75mg (31.4%, p=0.002), 150mg (32.9%, p<0.001), and 300mg (29.7%, p=0.002) groups and the sumatriptan group (35%, p<0.001) had pain freedom at two hours post-dose versus placebo (15.3%). For the secondary endpoint of sustained pain freedom from two to 24 hours post-dose, BMS-927711 doses (25-600mg) were also statistically significant compared with placebo. No deaths or treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) were reported, and no patients discontinued because of AEs. Conclusions BMS-927711 is superior to placebo at several different doses (75mg, 150mg, and 300mg) and has an excellent tolerability profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available