4.4 Article

Triptans and serious adverse vascular events: Data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database

Journal

CEPHALALGIA
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 5-13

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102413499649

Keywords

Triptans; migraine; adverse events; vascular events; pharmacovigilance; adverse event reporting system; disproportionality; data mining

Funding

  1. University of Bologna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The aim of this article is to investigate the vascular safety profile of triptans through an analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FDA_AERS) database with a special focus on serious and unexpected adverse events. Methods A case/non-case analysis was performed on the reports entered in the FDA_AERS from 2004 to 2010: Cases were reports with at least one event included in the MedDRA system organ classes Cardiac disorder' or Vascular disorders', whereas non-cases were all the remaining reports. Co-reported cardiovascular drugs were used as a proxy of cardiovascular risk and the adjusted reporting odds ratio (adj.ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was calculated. Disproportionality signals were defined as adj.ROR value >1. Adverse events were considered unexpected if not mentioned on the relevant label. Results Among 2,131,688 reports, 7808 concerned triptans. Cases were 2593 among triptans and 665,940 for all other drugs. Unexpected disproportionality signals were found in the following high-level terms of the MedDRA hierarchy: Cerebrovascular and spinal necrosis and vascular insufficiency' (103 triptan cases), Aneurysms and dissections non-site specific' (15), Pregnancy-associated hypertension' (10), Reproductive system necrosis and vascular insufficiency' (3). Discussion Our analysis revealed three main groups of unexpected associations between triptans and serious vascular events: ischaemic cerebrovascular events, aneurysms and artery dissections, and pregnancy-related vascular events. A case-by-case assessment is needed to confirm or disprove their plausibility and large-scale analytical studies should be planned for risk rate estimation. In the meantime, clinicians should pay special attention to migraine diagnosis and vascular risk assessment before prescribing a triptan, also promptly reporting any unexpected event to pharmacovigilance systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available