Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol, and caffeine in patients with severe headache: A post-hoc subgroup analysis from a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled parallel group study
H. C. Diener et al.
CEPHALALGIA (2011)
Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in tension-type headache: Second edition
L. Bendtsen et al.
CEPHALALGIA (2010)
Comparing Quantification of Pain Severity by Verbal Rating and Numeric Rating Scales
Marcel Dijkers
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE (2010)
A vertical VAS is a valid instrument for monitoring headache pain intensity
C. Lundqvist et al.
CEPHALALGIA (2009)
Influence of dementia on multiple components of pain
Miriam Kunz et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN (2009)
Difference in triptan effect in patients with migraine and early allodynia
C. Lampl et al.
CEPHALALGIA (2008)
Evaluating postherniorrhaphy groin pain: Visual Analogue or Verbal Rating Scale?
M. J. A. Loos et al.
HERNIA (2008)
Pain assessment in younger and older pain patients:: Psychometric properties and patient preference of five commonly used measures of pain intensity
Madelon L. Peters et al.
PAIN MEDICINE (2007)
Needle-free delivery of lidocaine for reducing the pain associated with the fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: Time-saving and efficacious procedure
Alptekin Gursoy et al.
THYROID (2007)
Validation of the eleven-point pain scale in the measurement of migraine headache pain
W. J. Kwong et al.
CEPHALALGIA (2007)
CRITICAL REVIEW OF EVALUATION TOOLS OF PAIN WITH ADULT CLIENTS SUFFERING FROM CANCER
Isabelle Cabot et al.
RECHERCHE EN SOINS INFIRMIERS (2007)
Predictors of hazardous alcohol consumption among patients with cluster headache
M Schürks et al.
CEPHALALGIA (2006)
The inconsistency of optimal cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve
NJ Perkins et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Asking the community about cutpoints used to describe mild, moderate, and severe pain
GR Palos et al.
JOURNAL OF PAIN (2006)
Pain assessment in invasive diagnostic procedures.: Comparison of an eleven-point numerical rating scale and a six-point verbal rating scale for pain measurement in bone marrow puncture
M Weber et al.
SCHMERZ (2005)
The fixed combination of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol and caffeine is more effective than single substances and dual combination for the treatment of headache: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled parallel group study
HC Diener et al.
CEPHALALGIA (2005)
Categorizing the severity of cancer pain: further exploration of the establishment of cutpoints
SM Paul et al.
PAIN (2005)
Comparison of three rating scales for measuring subjective phenomena in clinical research. I. Use of experimentally controlled auditory stimuli
C Lara-Munoz et al.
ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH (2004)
Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: A reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain
MP Jensen et al.
JOURNAL OF PAIN (2003)
Response relationship of VAS and Likert scales in osteoarthritis efficacy measurement
JA Bolognese et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2003)
Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain
B Page et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2002)
A comparison of visual analog scale and categorical ratings of headache pain in a randomized controlled clinical trial with migraine patients
CR Lines et al.
PAIN (2001)
A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data
EK Breivik et al.
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN (2000)
Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences
CC Preston et al.
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA (2000)
Share Paper
