4.7 Article

A comparison of isotope fractionation of carbon and hydrogen from paddy field rice roots and soil bacterial enrichments during CO2/H-2 methanogenesis

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages 983-995

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00812-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To better understand the isotope biogeochemistry of paddy field CH4, We investigated carbon and hydrogen isotope fractionation during CO2 reduction by a methanogenic community enriched from California paddy field soil and rice plants. Results from analyses of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) and sequences of the archaeal small-subunit (SSU) rRNA-encoding genes (rDNA) showed a difference in methanogenic community structure between the soil (dominated by Methanobacteriaceae) and roots (dominated by Methanospirillaceae) which was essentially the same for sampling dates 15 and 99 days after flooding (DAF). CO2/H-2 methanogenesis by these microbial communities produced CH4 with different isotope ratios and fractionation factors (a factors). The carbon isotope a factors in an open system with a continuous supply of 0.5% H-2 were 1.050 +/- 0.002 and 1.057 +/- 0.001 for soil and root enrichment cultures at 15 DAF, and 1.052 +/- 0.0.002 and 1.059 +/- 0.002 for soil and root enrichment cultures at 99 DAF, respectively. These a factors are similar to, but distinct from values previously obtained from cultures of mesophilic methanogens and are larger than calculated values (1.045) for paddy soil. Fractionation of hydrogen isotopes was also studied in a closed system under 80% H-2. The difference in a factors between soil and root enrichment cultures remained clear. The hydrogen isotope fractionations between culture water and the product CH4 were -327 +/- 14parts per thousand and -319 +/- 18parts per thousand for soil enrichments, and -389 +/- 17parts per thousand and -382 +/- 21parts per thousand for root enrichments at 15 DAF and 99 DAF, respectively. Copyright (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available