4.7 Article

Toward spectral classification of L and T dwarfs: Infrared and optical spectroscopy and analysis

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 564, Issue 1, Pages 466-481

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/324078

Keywords

infrared : stars; stars : low-mass, brown dwarfs; surveys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present 0.6-2.5 mum, Rgreater than or similar to400 spectra of 27 cool, low-luminosity stars and substellar objects. Based on these and previously published spectra, we develop a preliminary spectral classification system for L and T dwarfs. For late L and T types the classification system is based entirely on four spectral indices in the 1-2.5 mum interval. Two of these indices are derived from water absorption bands at 1.15 and 1.4 km, the latter of which shows a smooth increase in depth through the L and T sequences and can be used to classify both spectral types. The other two indices make use of methane absorption features in the H and K bands, with the K-band index also applicable to mid-to-late L dwarfs. Continuum indices shortward of 1 mum used by previous authors to classify L dwarfs are found to be useful only through mid-L subclasses. We employ the 1.5 mum water index and the 2.2 mum methane index to complete the L classification through L9.5 and to link the new system with a modified version of the 2MASS color-d index. By correlating the depths of the methane and water absorption features, we establish a T spectral sequence from T0 to T8, based on all four indices, that is a smooth continuation of the L sequence. We reclassify two 2MASS L8 dwarfs as L9 and L9.5 and identify one SDSS object as L9. In the proposed system methane absorption appears in the K band approximately at L8, two subclasses earlier than its appearance in the H band. The L and T spectral classes are distinguished by the absence and presence, respectively, of H-band methane absorption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available