4.6 Article

A standard stellar library for evolutionary synthesis - III. Metallicity calibration

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 381, Issue 2, Pages 524-538

Publisher

E D P SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011493

Keywords

catalogs; stars : abundances; stars : atmospheres; stars : fundamental parameters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We extend the colour calibration of the widely used BaSeL standard stellar library (Lejeune et al. 1997. 1998) to non-solar metallicities. down to [Fe/H] similar to -2.0 dex. Surprisingly, we find that at the present epoch it is virtually impossible to establish a unique calibration of UBVRIJHKL colours in terms of stellar metallicity [Fe/H] which is consistent simultaneously with both colour-temperature relations and colour-absolute magnitude diagrams (CMDs) based on observed globular cluster photometry data and on published. currently popular standard stellar evolutionary tracks and isochrones. The problem appears to be related to the long-standing incompleteness in our understanding of convection in late-type stellar evolution, but is also due to a serious lack of relevant observational calibration data that would help resolve, or at least further significant progress towards resolving this issue. In view of the most important applications of the BaSeL library, we here propose two different metallicity calibration versions: (1) the WLBC 99 library, which consistently matches empirical colour-temperature relations and which, therefore, should make an ideal tool for the study of individual stars: and (2), the PADOVA 2000 library, which provides isochrones from the Padova 2000 grid (Girardi et al. 2000) that successfully reproduce Galactic globular-cluster colour-absolute magnitude diagrams and which thus should prove particularly useful for studies of collective phenomena in stellar populations in clusters and galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available