4.7 Article

The angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype is associated with glomeruloathy lesions in type 2 diabetes

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 251-255

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.51.1.251

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic factors are important in conferring diabetic nephropathy (DN) risk. The insertion/deletion (LID) polymorphism of the ACE gene has been described to be associated with DN risk and progression. The renal lesions underlying DN in type 2 diabetes are heterogeneous; only a subset of patients, characterized by a faster decline of renal function, have diabetic glomerulopathy. This study explored the relations between diabetic glomerulopathy and the ACE genotype distribution in 77 type 2 diabetic patients with an albumin excretion rate greater than or equal to20 mug/min. Using morphometric analysis of kidney biopsies, mesangial and mesangial matrix fractional volumes [Vv(mes/glom) and Vv(MM/glom)] and glomerular basement membrane (GBM) width were estimated. We found that 13 patients were 11, 30 were ID, and 34 were DD. Clinical features and renal function were similar in the three groups; in contrast, the DD patients had the highest Vv(MM/glom) and GBM width. Subdividing patients in tertiles of GBM width and Vv(MM/glom), from the lowest (1) to the highest (III) values, the DD carriers had an odds ratio of 6.11 (95% CI 1.84-20.3) and 10.67 (2.51-45.36), respectively, for the likelihood of being in tertile III than I for GBM width and Vv(MM/glom). Multiple regression analysis revealed the I/D polymorphism as an independent determinant of GBM thickening in addition to diabetes duration and HbA(1c). In conclusion, the ACE DD genotype is associated with diabetic glomerulopathy lesions, making the study of this polymorphism helpful in identifying those type 2 diabetic patients at higher risk of fast DN progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available