4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A minimally monitored assisted reproduction stimulation protocol reduces cost without compromising success

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 98-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02956-9

Keywords

in vitro fertilization; gamete intrafallopian transfer; embryo transfer; assisted reproduction; ovarian stimulation; gonadotropin; ultrasound; leuprolide acetate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine if a fixed-dose stimulation protocol with monitoring limited to a single ultrasound can provide acceptable outcomes in assisted reproduction technologies (ART) procedures in appropriately selected patients. Design: Prospective study of all minimally monitored ART cycles from 1996 through 1998. Setting: University ART program. Patients: Eligibility included Institutional Review Board consent, age 18-37, basal FSH less than or equal to 10, normal semen parameters, and regular menses. IVF (n = 81) and GIFT (n = 14). Interventions: A single ultrasound was performed after 8 or 9 days of stimulation in a fixed-schedule long luteal phase leuprolide protocol. No hormone levels were obtained. Human chorionic gonadotropin was administered when at least 2 follicles were projected to reach 18 mm. Main Outcome Measures: Pregnancy, delivery, and implantation rates. Results: The clinical pregnancy rates were 51% for IVF and 36% for GIFT. Delivery rates were 42% for IVF and 29% for GIFT. The implantation rates for IVF were 23% and 17% for GIFT. No patient was admitted for ovarian hyperstimulation. Conclusions: We were able to achieve satisfactory pregnancy and delivery rates in properly selected patients with a minimal monitoring protocol, limited to a single ultrasound near the end of a fixed-stimulation regimen. The reduced time commitment and cost led to a very high patient acceptance of this approach. (Fertil Steril(R) 2002;77:98-100. (C) 2002 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available