4.7 Article

An observation-based model for corrosion of concrete sewers under aggressive conditions

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 61-62, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.03.013

Keywords

reaction; corrosion; concrete; modeling; Other sewer

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP0882016]
  2. Barwon Regional Water Corporation
  3. CH2M Hil
  4. Gold Coast Water
  5. Hunter Water Corporation
  6. Melbourne Water Corporation
  7. South Australia Water
  8. South East Water Limited
  9. Sydney Water Corporation
  10. United Water International
  11. Water Quality Research Australia
  12. Sewer Corrosion and Odour Research (SCORe)
  13. University of Queensland
  14. University of Sydney
  15. University of Technology Sydney
  16. Western Australia Water Corporation
  17. Australian Research Council [LP0882016] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of rational mathematical models for prediction of the likely present and future internal corrosion of reinforced concrete sewers requires understanding of the important physico-chemical processes, preferably based on field evidence. Samples of new and 70 year old pre-corroded concretes were exposed for up to 31 months in an aggressive sewer environment at 26 degrees C, 98% relative humidity and 79 ppm H2S concentration (averages). During the initial months of exposure the pH of the new concrete surfaces reduced rapidly however little corrosion loss was observed during this period. Subsequently pH reduced further, mass loss commenced and new concrete losses reached around 24 mm after 2 years. During the same period the old concrete corroded at an approximately constant rate. The presence of the corrosion product layer had negligible influence on corrosion losses. A bilinear corrosion loss model is proposed for practical applications. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available