4.7 Article

Shear-thickening behavior of high-performance cement grouts - Influencing mix-design parameters

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 230-235

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.004

Keywords

Cement paste; High-performance concrete; High-range water reducer; Shear-thickening; Rheology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rheology of concrete is of great importance to its flow performance, placement and consolidation. A full understanding of fresh concrete flow behavior can be achieved through a good understanding of paste rheology. Cement pastes exhibit a complex rheological behavior affected by several physical and chemical factors, including water-to-cement ratio (w/c), high-range water-reducer (HRWR) type and dosage, and cement characteristics. An experimental investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of w/c, HRWR-cement combinations, and supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) on the pseudoplastic behavior of high-performance cement grouts. Grout mixtures proportioned with w/c of 0.30, 0.33, 0.36. and 0.40, various cement-HRWR combinations, and cement substitutions by 8% silica fume were investigated. The incorporation of HRWR can lower the yield stress of mixtures, thus enhancing deformability, while silica fume improves mechanical and durability performances. High-performance structural grouts are shown to exhibit shear-thickening behavior at low w/c and shear-thinning behavior at relatively higher w/c. Mixtures made with polycarboxylate HRWR acting by steric effect exhibited greater shear-thickening behavior compared to those made with polynaphthalene sulfonate-based HRWR acting by electrostatic effect. The paper discusses the effect of mixture parameters on non-linear rheological behavior of various grout mixtures prepared with different w/c. HRWR-cement combinations, and silica fume. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available