4.6 Article

Trimodal spectroscopy for the detection and characterization of cervical precancers in vivo

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 3, Pages 374-382

Publisher

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.121075

Keywords

cancer; diagnostic; spectroscopy; fluorescence; diffuse reflectance; light scattering; cervical neoplasia

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [F32CA80345] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [P41RR02594] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [F32CA080345] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR002594] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the potential of 3 spectroscopic techniques (intrinsic fluorescence, diffuse reflectance, and light scattering) individually and in combination (trimodal spectroscopy) for the detection of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. STUDY DESIGN: The study was conducted with 44 patients who underwent colposcopy for the evaluation of an abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Fluorescence and reflectance spectra were collected from colposcopically normal and abnormal sites and analyzed to extract quantitative information about tissue biochemistry and morphologic condition. This information was compared with histopathologic classification, and diagnostic algorithms were developed and validated with the use of logistic regression and cross-validation. RESULTS: Diagnostically significant differences exist in the composition of fluorescing biochemicals, the scattering properties, and the epithelial cell nuclear morphology of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and non-squamous intraepithelial lesions. Trimodal spectroscopy is a superior tool for the detection of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions than any 1 of the techniques alone. CONCLUSION: Trimodal spectroscopy has the potential to improve the in vivo detection of precancerous cervical changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available