4.7 Article

Safety and efficacy of alteplase for restoring function in occluded central venous catheters: Results of the cardiovascular thrombolytic to open occluded lines trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 317-324

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.1.317

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of alteplase (TPA) for restoring function to occluded central venous catheters (CVCs). Patients and Methods: The study design was a phase III, open-label, single-arm multicenter trial. Subjects with occluded, nondialysis CVCs were enrolled. All subjects received a 2-mg dose of TPA within the dysfunctional catheter lumen that was allowed to dwell for 30 to 120 minutes. Functionality was tested at 30 and 120 minutes. If the CVC remained obstructed at 120 minutes, a second 2-mg TPA dose was allowed to dwell for 30 to 120 minutes. The primary safety end point was the rate of intracranial hemorrhage (1CH) within 5 days of treatment, and serious adverse events were recorded up to 30 days. Results: Nine hundred ninety-five patients received treatment (female, 562; male, 433; mean age, 50.7 years; range, 2 to 91 years). CVCs treated were as follows: single (26%), double (39%), or triple (6%) lumen catheters or ports (29%). The primary end point was 0% ICH within 5 days. There were no cases of death, major bleeding episodes, or embolic events attributable to treatment. Flow was successfully restored in 52% and 78% of CVCs at 30 and 120 minutes after one dose, and 84% and 87% at 30 and 120 minutes after a second dose, respectively. Restoration of flow was 86%, 93%,90%, and 79%, for single, double, and triple lumen catheters and ports, respectively. Estimated 30-day catheter patency was 74%. Conclusion: A regimen of up to two 2-mg doses of TPA is safe and effective for the restoration of flow to occluded central venous catheters. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available