4.6 Article

Ambient air pollution and risk of birth defects in southern California

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 155, Issue 1, Pages 17-25

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/155.1.17

Keywords

abnormalities; air pollution; carbon monoxide; cleft lip; cleft palate; environment and public health; heart defects, congenital; ozone

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R01ES010960] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [5P30ES70048, R01 ES010960] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors evaluated the effect of air pollution on the occurrence of birth defects ascertained by the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program in neonates and fetuses delivered in southern California in 1987-1993. By using measurements from ambient monitoring stations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulate matter <10 mum in aerodynamic diameter, they calculated average monthly exposure estimates for each pregnancy. Conventional, polytomous, and hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for subgroups of cardiac and orofacial defects. Odds ratios for cardiac ventricular septal defects increased in a dose-response fashion with increasing second-month CO exposure (odds ratio (OR)(2ndquartile) CO = 1.62, 95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.05, 2.48; OR3rdquartile CO = 2.09, 95% Cl: 1. 19, 3.67; OR4thquartile CO 2.95, 95% Cl: 1.44, 6.05). Similarly, risks for aortic artery and valve defects, pulmonary artery and valve anomalies, and conotruncal defects increased with second-month ozone exposure. The study was inconclusive for other air pollutants. The authors' results are supported by the specificity of the timing of the effect and some evidence from animal data; however, this is the first known study to link ambient air pollution during a vulnerable window of development to human malformations. Confirmation by further studies is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available