4.7 Article

Endothelial dysfunction and blood pressure variability in selected inbred mouse strains

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hq0102.101098

Keywords

aorta; blood pressure; endothelium; inbred mice

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-10425, HL-56006, HL-38901, HL-48058, HL-10237, HL-62984, HL-61446] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-24621] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL062984, R29HL038901, R01HL048058, R01HL038901, F32HL010425, R37HL048058, R01HL061446] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P01NS024621] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genetic regulation of blood pressure (BP) and endothelial function is likely to be polygenic. Because there is considerable variability in basal BP among inbred mouse strains, the purpose of this study was to determine whether a similar variability in vascular function exists among 7 normotensive strains. We tested the hypothesis that compared with mice with higher BPs, mice with lower BPs would have greater aortic endothelial responses to acetylcholine (ACh). Mean BP ranged from 117 to 145 mm Hg among the 7 strains. The responses of aortic rings to ACh, sodium nitroprusside, and papaverine were assessed after submaximal precontraction with prostaglandin F-2a. The aortas from all strains relaxed in a concentration-dependent manner to sodium nitroprusside and papaverine, but responses to ACh were markedly impaired in the aortas, but not carotid arteries, from 129P3/J and 129X1/SvJ mice. Aortas from the other strains relaxed normally to ACh. Furthermore, the endothelium-dependent dilators ADP and A23187 caused similar relaxation in 129P3/J, 129X1/SvJ, and C57BL/6J mice. Although the data do not support the initial hypothesis, the impaired aortic response to ACh in the 129 strains is a novel finding and illustrates the potential impact that genetic background can have on vascular responsiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available