4.1 Article

Active versus passive processing of biological motion

Journal

PERCEPTION
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 837-853

Publisher

PION LTD
DOI: 10.1068/p3072

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY12300] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY012300] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Johansson's point-light walker figures remain one of the most powerful and convincing examples of the role that motion can play in the perception of form (Johansson, 1973 Perception & Psychophysics 14 201-211; 1975 Scientific American 232(6) 76-88). In the current work, we use a dual-task paradigm to explore the role of attention in the processing of such stimuli. In two experiments we find striking differences in the degree to which direction-discrimination performance in point-light walker displays appears to rely on attention. Specifically, we find that performance in displays thought to involve top-down processing, either in time (experiment 1) or space (experiment 2) is adversely affected by dividing attention. In contrast, dividing attention has little effect on performance in displays that allow low-level, bottom-up computations to be carried out. We interpret these results using the active/passive motion distinction introduced by Cavanagh (1991 Spatial Vision 5 303-309).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available