4.7 Article

Mechanical properties of hybrid fabrics in pultruded cement composites

Journal

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 647-657

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.06.002

Keywords

Cement composites; Hybrid; Fabric; Tension; Textile; Pultrusion

Funding

  1. United States Israel Binational Science Foundation [2006098]
  2. Division Of Research On Learning
  3. Directorate for STEM Education [2006098] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work concerns the tensile properties of cement-based hybrid composites manufactured as: (i) sandwich composites that combine different layers of single fabric types; and (ii) hybrid composites, made from several yarn types within the same fabric. Hybrid combinations of low-modulus fabrics of polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) and high-modulus AR glass or aramid fabrics were prepared by the pultrusion process and tested in tension. Influence of pultrusion direction on the results was one of the parameters studied. It was found that hybrid composites made from PE and AR glass sustain strains better than 100% AR glass composites, and are stronger than a single PE fabric composite. A hybrid fabric composites made with combination of high strength-high cost aramid and low stiffness-low cost PP yarns performed better than a single aramid fabric composite relative to their reinforcing volume contents. Results show that making hybrid composites is an attractive option for cement-based elements. The performance of hybrid fabric composites is also influenced by the arrangement of fabric layers in the laminates. Composites with brittle and relatively strong fabrics (glass) at the mid-section and ductile fabrics (PE) near the surfaces of the composite performed better in tension than composites with the opposite arrangement. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available