4.5 Article

Effect of exercise intensity on 24-h energy expenditure and nutrient oxidation

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 1045-1052

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00706.2001

Keywords

whole room calorimeter; gender differences; fat oxidation; body weight regulation

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000051] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [K01DK061348, P30DK048520] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR-00051] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-049331] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK-42529, P30 DK-48520, K01 DK061348] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of exercise at different intensities on 24-h energy expenditure (EE) and substrate oxidation. Sixteen adults (8 men and 8 women) were studied on three occasions [sedentary day (Con), a low-intensity exercise day (LI; 400 kcal at 40% of maximal oxygen consumption) and a high-intensity exercise day (HI; 400 kcal at 70% of maximal oxygen consumption)] by using whole room indirect calorimetry. Both 24-h EE and carbohydrate oxidation were significantly elevated on the exercise days (Con < LI = HI), but 24-h fat oxidation was not different across conditions. Muscle enzymatic profile was not consistently related to 24-h fat or carbohydrate oxidation. With further analysis, it was found that, compared with men, women sustained slightly higher rates of 24-h fat oxidation (mg.kg FFM-1.min(-1)) and had a muscle enzymatic profile favoring fat oxidation. It is concluded that exercise intensity has no effect on 24-h EE or nutrient oxidation. Additionally, it appears that women may sustain slightly greater 24-h fat oxidation rates during waking and active periods of the day.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available