4.7 Article

Chromosome analysis of epididymal and testicular sperm in azoospermic patients undergoing ICSI

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 570-575

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.3.570

Keywords

aneuploidy; azoospermia; epididymal sperm; fluorescence in-situ hybridization; testicular sperm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Although ICSI provides a way of treating azoospermic men, concern has been raised about the potential risk for transmission of genetic abnormalities to the offspring. We quantified the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in epididymal and testicular sperm retrieved from azoospermic patients undergoing ICSI. METHODS: Individual testicular sperm were collected from testicular biopsies with an ICSI pipette, and epididymal sperm were retrieved by microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration. Samples were processed by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes 18, 21, X and Y and the results compared with those from normal ejaculated samples. RESULTS: The overall aneuploidy rate of 11.4% in men with non-obstructive azoospermia was significantly higher (P = 0.0001) than the 1.8% detected in epididymal sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia and also the 1.5% found in ejaculated sperm. No significant difference was found between the epididymal and ejaculated samples. When the chromosomal abnormalities were analysed, gonosomal disomy was the most recurrent abnormality in both obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermic patients, while autosomal disomy was the most frequent in ejaculated sperm. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm of non-obstructive azoospermic men had a higher incidence of chromosomal abnormalities, of which sex chromosome aneuploidy was the most predominant. Genetic counselling should be offered to all couples considering infertility treatment by ICSI with testicular sperm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available