4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Myocardial perfusion correlates with improvement of systolic function of the left ventricle after CABG. Dobutamine echocardiography and Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 32-35

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1010-7940(01)01078-8

Keywords

dobutamine; technetium-99m-sestamibi; echocardiography; revascularization; systolic function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of surgical revascularization [coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] on systolic function and perfusion of the left ventricle using dobutamine echocardiography (DE) and Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT (SPECT). Methods: There were 32 patients mean age 52.2 +/- 7.2 years in whom DE and SPECT were performed before and 3-4 months after CABG using standard protocols. Wall motion score index (WMSI) and perfusion index (PI) were calculated. Results: Significant improvement of WMSI at rest (1.44 +/- 0.46 vs 1.33 +/- 0.41; P = 0.03) as well as after maximal dose of dobutamine (1.49 +/- 0.42 vs 1.39 +/- 0.44: P = 0.02) was observed after CABG as compared to preoperative examination. Similar relation was observed during SPECT study. Perfusion index diminished significantly after revascularization during rest acquisition (2.19 +/- 0.71 vs 1.93 +/- 0.70; P = 0.0008) and after Dipirydamole administration (2.73 +/- 0.73 vs 2.20 +/- 0.69; P = 0.0001) as compared to preoperative examination. We found correlation between PI and WMSI at rest before CABG (R = 0.46; P = 0.01), PI after Dipirydamole and WMSI after maximal dose of Dobutamine before CABG (R = 0.37; P = 0.04), PI and WMSI at rest after CABG (R = 0.39; P = 0.03), PI after Dipirydamole and WMSI after dobutamine after CABG (R = 0.38; P = 0.03). Conclusions: Surgical revascularization significantly improves both perfusion and contractility. Increased perfusion after CABG correlates with improvement of systolic function of the left ventricle. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available