4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of water-redispersible nanofibrillated cellulose in powder form

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 19-30

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-009-9372-3

Keywords

Cellulose; Carboxymethylation; Mechanical disintegration; Nanofibrils; Hornification; Water-redispersible

Funding

  1. State Secretariat for Education and Research (SER)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water-redispersible, nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) in powder form was prepared from refined, bleached beech pulp (RBP) by carboxymethylation (c) and mechanical disintegration (m). Two routes were examined by altering the sequence of the chemical and mechanical treatment, leading to four different products: RBP-m and RBP-mc (route 1), and RBP-c and RBP-cm (route 2). The occurrence of the carboxymethylation reaction was confirmed by FT-IR spectrometry and C-13 solid state NMR (C-13 CP-MAS) spectroscopy with the appearance of characteristic signals for the carboxylate group at 1,595 cm(-1) and 180 ppm, respectively. The chemical modification reduced the crystallinity of the products, especially for those of route 2, as shown by XRD experiments. Also, TGA showed a decrease in the thermal stability of the carboxymethylated products. However, sedimentation tests revealed that carboxymethylation was critical to obtain water-redispersible powders: the products of route 2 were easier to redisperse in water and their aqueous suspensions were more stable and transparent than those from route 1. SEM images of freeze-dried suspensions from redispersed RBP powders confirmed that carboxymethylation prevented irreversible agglomeration of cellulose fibrils during drying. These results suggest that carboxymethylated and mechanically disintegrated RBP in dry form is a very attractive alternative to conventional NFC aqueous suspensions as starting material for derivatization and compounding with (bio)polymers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available