Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 65-71Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1093/bja/88.1.65
Keywords
surgery, femoral fracture; measurement techniques, oesophageal Doppler; ultrasonagraphy; complications, postoperative hypotension; monitoring, intraoperative
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background. A prospective, randomized controlled trial; comparing conventional intraoperative fluid management with two differing methods of invasive haemodynamic monitoring to optimize intraoperative fluid therapy, in patients undergoing proximal femoral fracture repair under general anaesthesia. Methods. Ninety patients randomized to three groups; conventional intraoperative fluid management (Gp CON, n=29), and two groups receiving additional repeated colloid fluid challenges guided by central venous pressure (Gp CVP, n=31) or oesophageal Doppler Ultrasonography (Gp DOP, n=30). Primary outcome measures were time to medical fitness to discharge, hospital stay and postoperative morbidity. Results. The fluid challenge resulted in significantly greater perioperative changes in central venous pressure between Gp CVP and Gp CON (mean 5 (95% confidence interval 3-7) mm Hg) (P<0.0001). Important perioperative changes were also shown in Gp DOP with increases of 49.4 ms (19.7-79.1 ms) in the corrected flow time, 13.5 ml (7.4-19.6 ml) in stroke volume, and 0.9 (0.49-1.39) litre min(-1) in cardiac output. As a result, fewer patients in Gp CVP and Gp DOP experienced severe intraoperative hypotension (Gp CON 28% (8/29), Gp CVP 9% (3/ 31), Gp DOP 7% (2/30), P=0.048 (chi-squared, 2 degrees of freedom (do). No differences were seen between the three groups when major morbidity and mortality were combined, P=0.24 (chi-squared, 2 cl. Postoperative recovery for survivors, as defined by time to be deemed medically fit for discharge, was significantly faster, in comparison with Gp CON, in both the Gp CVP (10 vs 14 (95% confidence interval 8-12 vs 12-17) days, P=0.008 (t-test)), and Gp DOP (8 vs 14 (95% confidence interval 6-12 vs 12-17) days, P=0.023 (t-test). There were no significant differences between groups, for survivors, with respect to acute orthopaedic hospital and total hospital stay. Conclusions. Invasive intraoperative haemodynamic, monitoring with fluid challenges during repair of femoral fracture under general anaesthetic shortens time to being medically fit for discharge.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available