4.7 Article

The illusion of the learning phase for lymphatic mapping

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 142-147

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1007/BF02557365

Keywords

sentinel node; learning phase; sensitivity-identification rate; binomial distribution; critical value

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We provide a statistical analysis of the learning phase for sentinel node biopsy. Methods: Four learning phases were analyzed: 25, 50, 75, and 150 procedures with a corresponding number of 10, 20, 30, and 60 tumor-positive cases. Critical values of nonidentification rate and false-negative rate were defined, The binomial distribution was used to calculate the probabilities of correctly or incorrectly accepting the quality of the performance, given a certain long-term nonidentification or false-negative rate. Results: The chance of incorrectly reaching a favorable false-negative rate of <10% (critical value) in 20 metastasized patients was 18% for a surgeon with a long-term probability of false-negative procedures of 15%. This chance was reduced to 10% with a learning phase of 60 tumor-positive cases. When this chance has to be further reduced to 5%, the critical value has to be lower in smaller groups, of patients: 5% false-negative rate in 20 tumor-positive procedures. Conclusions: A learning phase of at least 150 procedures with 60 tumor-positive cases is needed to draw any reliable conclusion about the quality of sentinel node biopsy. In general, a compromise has to be made between the reliability of the results and the practically achievable number of procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available